Modal verbs are used to discuss possible situations ("possible worlds") and make various kinds of conditional statements.
Toaq's modal verbs are based on the following grid:
Indicative | Subjunctive | |
---|---|---|
Necessity | she | ao |
Possibility | daı | ea |
Each modality type (necessity vs possibility) comes in two forms: indicative and subjunctive.
The general place structure pattern of modal verbs is as follows:
Pattern: monadic → ___ is [modal]-ly the case. |
Pattern: dyadic → ___ is [modal]-ly the case in world(s) where ___ is the case. |
Thanks to their place structure, Toaq’s modals can be used to express bare (unrestricted) modal claims and subjunctives by using the monadic meaning, or to express a (restricted) conditional statement by using the dyadic meaning via a prepositional construction ( tone).
With indicative predicates we make claims about the actual (current) world. We increment our stock of knowledge hypothetically with the antecedent and then evaluate on that basis the consequent.
Necessity:
Possibility:
The subjunctive verbs are counterfactual, i.e., the antecedent is contrary to the facts of the current world. They make claims about alternative universes, ones in which the antecedent holds.
Necessity:
Possibility:
Every modal verb can also be used without the restrictor phrase. Usually, this will mean using it as the head of the verbal complex. An unrestricted ao corresponds to a bare "if"-less would-sentence in English, for example: